What an information – filled issue! The million dollar pricing helped me think about the choices that Tucson has to make. The federal $46B for a wall that isn't needed provided an incredible example of waste in federal spending. Ciscomani's position on Medicaid cuts is disingenuous. And thanks for the link to the report on tiny homes. A real contribution to our community that will have lasting impact.
I’m always very interested to know WHICH environmental regulations a politician thinks is onerous. The ones that ensure clean air? The ones that ensure clean water? The ones that require a public process when issuing new permits?
According to Project 2025, they want to dismantle the “Potential To Emit” standard for permit classification. I won’t get into the details, but going from potential to “actual emissions” sounds nice, but it’s nearly impossible to measure year-to-year actuals in advance for regulation and permitting.
I’d be very interested to know which regulations Congressman Ciscomani thinks needs to be cut. It’s such an often-used sentiment, but rare to see anyone follow it up with more detail.
Hate to point this out, but there is only 170K in your 'million dollar' illustration... Just sayin'!
But seriously, how does CiscoMAGA know that there is $100B in illegitimate payments through Medicaid? Sounds like a made-up round number to begin with - suspect he's just quoting DOGE. But more importantly, if they already know that these payments are going to able-bodied people without kids, why don't they know who these fraudsters are and cut them off already? Utter rot. If DOGE has proven anything, it's that there is VERY LITTLE fraud, waste, or abuse in our federal budget. They've rampaged through the federal government and found almost NOTHING to cut that are not just things they ideologically oppose, rather than actual waste.
Thanks, we've given a verbal warning to our ChatGPT art intern.
Ciscomani said in his tele town hall that he doesn't think some hypothetical able-bodied 30 year-olds should be eligible for Medicaid. This MIGHT be what he is referring to, but it is on our list of questions we have for his office.
What an information – filled issue! The million dollar pricing helped me think about the choices that Tucson has to make. The federal $46B for a wall that isn't needed provided an incredible example of waste in federal spending. Ciscomani's position on Medicaid cuts is disingenuous. And thanks for the link to the report on tiny homes. A real contribution to our community that will have lasting impact.
I’m always very interested to know WHICH environmental regulations a politician thinks is onerous. The ones that ensure clean air? The ones that ensure clean water? The ones that require a public process when issuing new permits?
According to Project 2025, they want to dismantle the “Potential To Emit” standard for permit classification. I won’t get into the details, but going from potential to “actual emissions” sounds nice, but it’s nearly impossible to measure year-to-year actuals in advance for regulation and permitting.
I’d be very interested to know which regulations Congressman Ciscomani thinks needs to be cut. It’s such an often-used sentiment, but rare to see anyone follow it up with more detail.
Hate to point this out, but there is only 170K in your 'million dollar' illustration... Just sayin'!
But seriously, how does CiscoMAGA know that there is $100B in illegitimate payments through Medicaid? Sounds like a made-up round number to begin with - suspect he's just quoting DOGE. But more importantly, if they already know that these payments are going to able-bodied people without kids, why don't they know who these fraudsters are and cut them off already? Utter rot. If DOGE has proven anything, it's that there is VERY LITTLE fraud, waste, or abuse in our federal budget. They've rampaged through the federal government and found almost NOTHING to cut that are not just things they ideologically oppose, rather than actual waste.
Thanks, we've given a verbal warning to our ChatGPT art intern.
Ciscomani said in his tele town hall that he doesn't think some hypothetical able-bodied 30 year-olds should be eligible for Medicaid. This MIGHT be what he is referring to, but it is on our list of questions we have for his office.