6 Comments

Congrats on the Rulney story. You were the first to break it as fas as I could see. This is what we want to see in the Agenda(s)

Expand full comment
author

Thanks, Paul! We were the first ones to break it by several hours.

Expand full comment

What is the board of Regents going to do about “Robbie”? Will any of them talk to you about the fiasco Robbins nurtured? Do any of them take on responsibility for his obvious faults and then say nothing? Are they doing what Robbins himself is doing…trying to protect those of his staff who are either incompetent or just make terrible decisions?

Congratulations on this story…I hope you can find the full story of the Regents…an anxious public awaits.

Paul Mercer

Expand full comment
author

Thanks, Paul!

I reached out to John Arnold yesterday to see if he (in his capacity as interim CFO) or the regents were aware of Rulney's non-resignation. Didn't hear back. But I'll reach out to the other regents and will keep digging.

Expand full comment

To be honest, I wouldn't be very upset that Rulney is still employed. After all, she was simply carrying out Robbins' orders. I suppose her salary in the "new" position is a matter of public record, so it would be interesting to see. Perhaps she's even making more money since she knows "where the bodies are buried"!

Expand full comment
author

Hi Jim, she's making the same salary in this position as she was in her previous role.

Expand full comment