Misinformation has trickled into local weather ... Questionable forecasts by a controversial figure have blown up on social media ... New president in town?
*Slow Clap* Great job injecting politics into a story that didn’t once mention them. This election is really bringing out the insufferables on both sides.
"We observed a marked lopsidedness in the political slant of the shared fake news articles: A majority came from pro-Republican outlets and were shared by people who identified as Republicans."
Does Martin own a Sharpie? If so, I think Trump has found his director of the NWS should he win in November.
In case my joke is too obscure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Dorian–Alabama_controversy
*Slow Clap* Great job injecting politics into a story that didn’t once mention them. This election is really bringing out the insufferables on both sides.
Why not? Fake news is part of the republican platform.
Neither party has a monopoly on “Fake News” If you think they do, you’re part of the hyper partisan problem.
"We observed a marked lopsidedness in the political slant of the shared fake news articles: A majority came from pro-Republican outlets and were shared by people who identified as Republicans."
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-partisan-polarization-drives-the-spread-of-fake-news/
And what, exactly, does any of that have to do with what’s posted in the Tucson Agenda?